The underlying philosophies of education in Asian contexts, in my limited experience, are fundamentaly different from those of Western countries. The attached article draws out some of the culture based differences in each general context in a comparison of Confucian and Socratic approaches to learning.
Many of the new methods teachers in Asia are adopting or trying to adapt, at least, are western and these rely on student participation in classrooms in contrasting ways. From my own experience as a product of the western education system and now a teacher trainer in Asia, the most visible and perhaps the most important contrast is in the dynamics of student questioning in class. In the west, students' exploratory and clarifying questions are encouraged by most teachers and this reflects the fundamental principle of the Socratic approach but most teachers in Asia I have observed in class limit questioning to their own and it is often simply: "Do you understand?" Is what I observe the common reality or does the fact I'm a foreigner influence the dynamics and skew reality as a result? Is the picture of the Confusian approach drawn in the article a true one in your context? Do you encourage students' questions in your context? Do you think that such questioning is necessary or positive? Which approach do you think better prepares students for the future in a world of cultures and societies becoming more and more connected?
Tags:
Share
- Attachments:
-
-
▶ Reply to This